Aphra Behn's The Rover

 Hello,  

This blog is a part of thinking activity. 

Question 1. Angellica considers the financial negotiations that one makes before marrying a prospective bride the same as prostitution. Do you agree?

➡In Aphra Behn's play The Rover, Angellica considers the financial negotiations that one makes before marrying a prospective bride to be the same as prostitution. 

Angellica's view of marriage is shaped by the social and economic conditions of her time. In seventeenth-century England, women were largely dependent on men for financial support. Marriage was seen as a way for women to secure their financial future, and dowries were often used to negotiate marriage contracts. This practice could lead to women being treated as commodities, and it is likely that Angellica has seen firsthand the negative consequences of this system.

Angellica sees financial negotiations before marriage, where one party may expect or receive money or assets, as similar to prostitution. In her perspective, both situations involve a form of transaction where one person provides something of value (money or assets) in exchange for a specific kind of relationship, whether it's marriage or companionship in the case of prostitution. 

Question 2. All women together ought to let flowers fall upon the tomb of Aphra Behn, for it was she who earned them the right to speak their minds." Virginia Woolf said so in 'A Room of One's Own'. Do you agree with this statement? Justify your answer with reference to your reading of the play 'The Rover.

➡Virginia Woolf believed that women should honor Aphra Behn because she helped women gain the right to express themselves freely. Woolf thought Behn's work was important in advancing women's voices.

Aphra Behn was one of the first successful female writers in England. She was the first English woman to make a living from her writing, and she wrote in a variety of genres, including plays, poetry, and fiction. Her work was popular with both male and female audiences, and she challenged many of the prevailing social and literary conventions of her time. Aphra Behn's work often dealt with themes of female empowerment and independence. Her plays often featured strong female characters who were not afraid to speak their minds.

Aphra Behn lived in a time when women were expected to be silent and submissive, but she refused to conform to these expectations. She spoke her mind freely, even when it meant facing criticism or ridicule.

In her play The Rover, Behn features a female protagonist, Hellena, who is intelligent, resourceful, and independent. Hellena is not afraid to challenge the male characters in the play, and she ultimately outsmarts them all.

Virginia Woolf's statement about Behn is a reminder of the importance of women's voices in literature and in society as a whole. Aphra Behn's work helped to create a space for women to speak their minds. 

Question 3. Which female character best represents the playwright, Aphra Behn? Consider the characteristics and beliefs of each female character, and make an argument that relates these distinctive attributes to what you know about Behn.

➡The female character who best represents the playwright Aphra Behn is Hellena from her play The Rover. Hellena is a strong, independent, and intelligent woman who is not afraid to speak her mind or challenge the status quo. She is also resourceful and witty, and she is always able to outsmart the men in her life.

Aphra Behn herself was a strong and independent woman who lived in a time when women were expected to be silent and submissive. She refused to conform to these expectations, and she spoke her mind freely, even when it meant facing criticism or ridicule. Behn was also a resourceful and witty writer, and she was able to create complex and believable female characters in her work. 

Both women believe in the importance of female empowerment and independence. Hellena is a woman who is determined to control her own destiny, and she refuses to be defined by the men in her life. Behn herself was a strong advocate for women's rights, and her work often challenged the traditional gender roles of her time.

Thank you.  

Jude the Obscure

Q Hello,

This blog is based upon thinking activity.  

 Question: What is significance of epigraph written by hardy 'Letter killeth'- for this novel - Jude the obscure.  

The epigraph "Letter killeth" in Thomas Hardy's novel "Jude the Obscure" carries several layers of significance:

▶Biblical Allusion: The phrase is a reference to 2 Corinthians 3:6 in the Bible, which reads, "Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." In the context of the novel, it alludes to the conflict between rigid, literal interpretation of religious doctrine (the "letter") and a more flexible, spiritual understanding (the "spirit").

▶Critique of Conventional Morality: The epigraph sets the tone for the novel, highlighting the characters' struggles against the restrictive moral and social norms of Victorian society. It suggests that adherence to these conventions can be stifling and harmful, even "killing" the spirit and individuality of the characters.

▶Foreshadowing Tragedy: The epigraph foreshadows the tragic events that unfold in the novel. It implies that the characters' attempts to break free from societal constraints and follow their desires, symbolized by the "spirit," may lead to suffering and ruin.

▶Irony: There's an irony in the epigraph because, as the story progresses, it becomes evident that the characters' pursuit of their own desires often leads to their downfall. The "spirit" that they follow, their individualistic aspirations, doesn't necessarily bring life and happiness, but instead, it results in pain and tragedy.

In summary, the epigraph "Letter killeth" in "Jude the Obscure" encapsulates the central themes of the novel, including the tension between conformity and individualism, the consequences of breaking with societal norms, and the irony of how the characters' pursuit of their own desires ultimately leads to suffering.

Question : Is it possible to connect the meaning of the epigraph of 'Esdras' at the beginning of the first chapter of the novel and the myth of Bhasmasur?

The epigraph at the beginning of the first chapter of Thomas Hardy's "Jude the Obscure" is a quote from the Book of Esdras, specifically from the Apocrypha. It reads, "The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."

While the epigraph itself is not directly related to the Hindu myth of Bhasmasur, there are some thematic connections that can be drawn between the two:

➡Conflict between Literal and Figurative Interpretations: In both cases, there is a conflict between a literal or rigid interpretation ("the letter" in the epigraph) and a more abstract or symbolic interpretation ("the spirit"). In the Book of Esdras, this contrast is related to religious interpretation, while in the Bhasmasur myth, it is related to a literal and dangerous interpretation of a boon granted by a deity.

➡Consequences of Misinterpretation: In the Bhasmasur myth, the character misinterprets Lord Shiva's boon, leading to destructive consequences. In "Jude the Obscure," the characters often misinterpret societal and moral norms, leading to tragic outcomes. Both cases highlight the potential harm that can come from misunderstanding or misapplying principles.

➡Themes of Misfortune and Tragedy: Both the novel and the myth involve elements of misfortune and tragedy. The novel portrays the struggles and sufferings of its characters who defy societal norms, while the Bhasmasur myth results in chaos and harm due to a misunderstanding of a divine gift.

While these thematic connections can be drawn, it's important to note that the specific cultural, religious, and historical contexts of the epigraph and the Bhasmasur myth are quite different. The epigraph from "Jude the Obscure" is rooted in a Christian context, while the Bhasmasur myth is a Hindu myth. Nonetheless, both highlight the potential consequences of misinterpretation and the conflict between strict, literal understanding and more symbolic or spiritual interpretations. 

Question: Structure of the novel Jude the obscure. 

Jude the Obscure" by Thomas Hardy is structured as a novel with a conventional narrative structure. It consists of several key elements:

➡Chapters: The novel is divided into chapters, each with its own title. The chapters help organize the story and often focus on specific events or characters.

➡Third-Person Omniscient Narration: The novel is primarily narrated by a third-person omniscient narrator, who has access to the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters. This narrative style allows readers to gain insights into the inner lives of various characters.

➡Linear Chronology: The story follows a linear chronological structure, moving forward in time as the events unfold. The narrative begins with Jude Fawley as a young boy and progresses through his life.

➡Character-Centered: The novel focuses on the lives of its main characters, particularly Jude Fawley and his cousin and love interest, Sue Bridehead. It explores their individual journeys, struggles, and relationships.

➡Realistic Setting: The story is set in the fictional county of Wessex, a region often used by Thomas Hardy in his works. The settings are described in detail, providing a sense of place and atmosphere.

➡Themes and Social Commentary: Throughout the novel, Hardy explores themes such as the limitations of social class, the constraints of marriage and society, education, religion, and personal aspirations. He uses the characters and their experiences to comment on societal norms and expectations.

➡Symbolism and Allusion: Hardy employs symbolism and allusion in the novel. For example, the epigraphs at the beginning of each section provide insights into the novel's themes.

➡Tragic Arc: "Jude the Obscure" follows a tragic narrative arc, with the characters facing hardships and suffering. The story does not offer a conventional happy ending, and the characters' struggles reflect the challenges of the time and the 

➡Exploration of Relationships: The novel delves into complex relationships, including romantic and familial bonds. It explores the dynamics of love, marriage, and the tensions that can arise in these relationships.

 Overall, the structure of "Jude the Obscure" serves as a framework for Thomas Hardy to explore the novel's themes and deliver a powerful commentary on the social and moral issues of his time. It is known for its realism, complexity, and its portrayal of the struggles faced by the characters in their pursuit of personal happiness and fulfillment.

Work cited:-

Chatgpt.” ChatGPT, 20 October. 2023, openai.com/chatgpt

Thank you. 

Tale of a tub

 Hello,  

This blog is based upon thinking 

For more details you can Visit here

Question :  How far do you think Digression is necessary?

  

   Digressions can be helpful to explain things, but too many can confuse the main story. So, some digression is necessary, but not too much. 

      In a novel, authors sometimes include digressions to give readers a richer and more detailed experience. These can be like little side stories or explanations that provide context, background, or extra insights.

     Some digressions help you understand characters and places better, and also enhance the reading experience. But it's up to author that how much digression can use in the work. And the way author use, it can make story more interesting. 

Question : Identify any one movie/web series/song/poem/novel which talks about the sensitive topic like religion. Write in brief about it and explain what kind questions are raised through 

Paradise Lost" is an epic poem written by John Milton, an English poet, in the 17th century. It consists of twelve books and was first published in 1667.

The poem explores the biblical story of the Fall of Man, primarily focusing on the characters of Satan, Adam, and Eve.In "Paradise Lost," religion is a central theme and also including the creation, human choice, rebellion, and divine justice.

In "Paradise Lost," religion is depicted from a Christian perspective. It talks about the story of Adam and Eve and how they made choices, which God knew in advance. It also portrays Satan as a rebellious character. The poem tries to explain why there is suffering in the world if God is good, and it talks about the possibility of redemption through Christ. 

It talks about the Bible and talks about things like free will, good and evil, and God's plan. The author, John Milton, was a strong Christian, so the poem is filled with religious ideas and themes. It's a bit like a big, poetic discussion about God, sin, and how people make choices.

Milton's paradise lost, rised a questions like 

●In the poem, God creates Adam first and then Eve as a companion for him. Why God not created Eve (Female) first. 

●After the fall, both Adam and Eve are punished, but some feminist interpretations focus on Eve receiving a more significant portion of blame and suffering. 

●If the God really wants that Adam and Eve don't eat the fruit, then why they create tree or why they don't cut it off. 

●One interpretation is that God allowed Satan to enter the Garden of Eden to test the obedience and free will of Adam and Eve. God wanted them to have the choice to follow His command or not. By not securing the Garden. Why God not secure the garden? 

● Did Satan have a public relations team, or did he just wing it with the whole rebellion against God thing?

Thank you.  

Pride and prejudice

 Hello, 

 This blog is based upon thinking activity. 

Question: Compare the narrative Strategy of the novel and the movie.  

       In the story of novel, Narrative Strategy is to tell  the multiple perspectives, but the main prospective is the Elizabeth's (The protagonist) perspective. The narrator is omniscient, meaning that they know the thoughts and feelings of all of the characters, but they choose to focus on Elizabeth's perspective.

       Austen also uses a variety of literary techniques, such as free indirect discourse, to reveal the characters' inner thoughts and feelings. Elizabeth was determined to hate Mr. Darcy, but she couldn't help but be attracted to him." This allows the reader to see directly into Elizabeth's mind and to understand her conflicted feelings about Mr. Darcy. 

     The narrator often tells the reader what to think about the characters and their actions. Austen also uses a special writing technique to show the reader what Elizabeth is thinking, even though she doesn't say it out loud.

The narrative strategy of the 2005 movie adaptation of Pride and Prejudice is to tell the story primarily from Elizabeth's perspective, with some scenes from Darcy's perspective. It uses close-ups, flashbacks, and other filmmaking techniques to make the story more exciting and engaging for the viewer.

▶ In the novel, the reader learns about Darcy's first proposal to Elizabeth through her letter to him. In the movie, the viewer sees Darcy propose to Elizabeth, and the audience learns about her rejection of him through her dialogue with Charlotte Lucas.

▶ In the novel, the reader learns about Darcy's thoughts and feelings about Elizabeth through his own internal monologue. In the movie, the viewer learns about Darcy's thoughts and feelings through his facial expressions and body language, as well as through his dialogue with other characters.

▶ In the novel, the reader is given access to the thoughts and feelings of all of the characters, including the minor characters. In the movie, the viewer is primarily given access to the thoughts and feelings of Elizabeth and Darcy.

Question: Write an illustration of the society of Jane Austen's time. 

       Jane Austen's novels are set in England during the Regency era, which lasted from 1811 to 1820. This was a time of great social change. 

      During the late 18th and early 19th centuries, society was structured by social classes. During that time, some people were rich and had a lot of power. Others had regular jobs and were in the middle. Some people had to work hard for very little money and struggled more. 

      People were expected to follow certain rules, especially regarding behavior and marriage. Marrying well, meaning someone of equal or higher status, was crucial for social standing and financial stability.

     Austen's novels typically focus on the lives of young women in this leisured class. Her female characters are intelligent, witty, and independent, but they are also bound by the social conventions of their time. For example, women in Austen's society were expected to marry well in order to secure their financial future. Marriage was also the only way for women to gain any real independence or social status. 

      Her characters attend balls, dinners, and other social events and at that time they find suitable male character for them.

      Not all of Austen's characters were wealthy and privileged. She also wrote about the lives of the poor and working class. However, her novels are best known for their portrayal of the upper and middle classes, and the social world they inhabited.

Question: What if Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth  never got together? 

      If Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth never got together in Pride and Prejudice, it would have been a very different novel. Their relationship is the central focus of the Novel.

Elizabeth would have married someone else. She was a popular and intelligent young woman. And Mr. Darcy would have married someone else. He was a wealthy and powerful man.

There are also a chance that Elizabeth might have married Mr. Collins, as her mother and aunt wished. Or Elizabeth might have remained unmarried. She was fiercely independent and had high standards, so she would not have settled for a man who was not worthy of her. And Darcy might have married Caroline Bingley, his cousin. However, he did not love her, and she was a shallow and materialistic woman.

The novel would have been less satisfying. Pride and Prejudice is a love story, and without the love between Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth, it would have been much less enjoyable to read.

● What If Lydia's elopement had a different out come?

If Lydia's elopement had a different outcome in Pride and Prejudice, it would have had a major impact on the lives of the Bennet family and the other characters in the novel.

If Lydia hadn't run away with Wickham, the Bennet family would have been better off. Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy's relationship would have been easier. The story would have been happier.

● Explore the consequences of these change and write alternative ending to the novel.

There are possibility that if Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth never got together, and What If Lydia's elopement had a different out come.

Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth both never get married and novel might end unsatisfied.

But Elizabeth lived a happy life without a husband. She was strong and independent, and she didn't need a man to be complete.

And also there are one thing that The Bennet family might struggle a lot and faces financial problems.

The alternative ending to Pride and Prejudice is a reminder that love is not the only measure of a happy life. and it might thought that creat our own happiness, don't depend on someone.

Thank you.

Hard Times

 Hello,

This blog is based upon Thinking activity. 

▶ Discuss the theme of 'Utilitarianism' with illustrations from the novel Hard Times and other themes. 

           Utilitarianism in the context of the novel "Hard Times" by Charles Dickens refers to the philosophical and societal beliefs prevalent during the Victorian era, emphasizing utility and practicality over emotion and imagination. 

          Utilitarianism is the idea that the right thing to do is the thing that will make the most people happy. In Hard Times, Dickens shows us that utilitarianism can have negative consequences when it is taken to its extreme. When people are valued only for their usefulness, they are treated like objects rather than human beings.

           The novel Hard Times starts with the scene of a schoolroom. Here children are made to stuff their minds with facts and logic. There are no Imaginations and emotions. 

          Charles Dickens connives a theme of utilitarianism, along with education and industrialization. Utilitarianism is the belief that something is morally right if it helps a majority of people. It is a principle involving nothing but facts and leaves no room for creativity or imagination.

       Thomas Gradgrind in "Hard Times" believes that focusing on facts, numbers, and practical things is the most important. He raises his children to think this way too, emphasizing productivity and efficiency while ignoring emotions and creativity. It's like saying being practical and useful to society matters most, even if it means suppressing feelings and personal happiness.

       Dickens uses Cecelia Jupe, daughter of a circus clown, who is the complete opposite of Thomas Gradgrind to provide a great contrast of a utilitarian belief.

       Josiah Bounderby is another prime example of utilitarianism. He is one of the wealthiest people in Coketown; owning a bank and a factory, but is not really a likable person. His utilitarian philosophy is similar to Gradgrinds in the sense that factuality is the single most important virtue that one could possess. Mr. Bounderby maintained throughout the story his utilitarian views, which basically stated that nothing else is important besides profit. 

       Dickens also added circus people as a contrast to the utilitarian approach to life. The circus people could be called the total opposite of utilitarianism.

        The circus people are simple, open-minded human beings whose goal in life is to make people laugh. Dickens portrays them as a step up from the “Hands” but still close to the bottom in the social structure. These people are hated by Gradgrind, Bounderby and other utilitarians because they represent everything that is shunned in utilitarianism such as love, imagination, and humor.

        The people that did not fall victim to the utilitarian trap were able to live their lives happily and freely, able to love, laugh, and use their imagination; which is the way life ought to be lived.  

       Dickens’ ultimate message is to show the value of imagination, art, and human connection in a place dominated by fact and rationality. When Gradgrind’s children, Louisa and Tom face hardship because they followed their father’s utilitarian thinking, it is ultimately Sissy who will be the one who pilots change in the imaginary of the Gradgrinds. 

➡Other themes of the novel Hard times 

   ● Fact vs. Fancy

        Fact vs. fantasy" in "Hard Times" means showing the difference between relying on realistic, practical information (facts) versus imaginative or unrealistic ideas (fantasy). It's about understanding the importance of reality and practicality in life.

       The character Thomas Gradgrind embodies the theme of fact vs. fantasy. He's focused on facts and logic, promoting a practical, no-nonsense approach to life. On the other hand, Sissy Jupe represents fantasy and imagination, coming from a circus background where creativity and imagination are valued. 

   ● Individualism Vs Community 

      Individualism is like when people are so focused on their own success, money, or ideas that they forget about others. Characters like Mr. Gradgrind and Mr. Bounderby are all about making money and advancing themselves, often at the expense of others  Mr. Gradgrind focusing only on facts and profit. On the other hand, community is about caring for everyone, like how Sissy Jupe and others show compassion and help each other, thinking beyond just their own need. when Stephen Blackpool, a poor worker, faces difficulties, and his friends and fellow workers try to support him.

       The Novel shows us that a good society needs a balance.While it's essential to think about ourselves and succeed individually, we should also care for others and work together for the benefit of everyone. Too much focus on just oneself can lead to problems.

 ● Social Injustice and Class Struggles

      In "Hard Times," social injustice and class struggles shows that some people are treated unfairly or poorly because of where they come from or how much money they have.

      in the story, there are two main classes of people: the rich factory owners like Mr. Bounderby and the poor workers like Stephen Blackpool. The rich have power and money, and they often make life difficult for the poor. Stephen Blackpool, a worker, represents the struggles of the lower class. He works hard but is trapped in a difficult life because of his low position and the unfair system. 

       Tom Gradgrind, the son of Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, is a key character who turns to a life of crime. He steal money from the bank where he works and frames an innocent man, Stephen Blackpool, for the theft.

● Feminism 

     Feminism in "Hard Times" is about showing that women should have the same rights and opportunities as men. In the book, characters like Louisa face limits on their choices and roles because they're female.  Louisa is well educated and she make her Life's decision by herself but she cannot do. She is depending on her Father and brother. She did not make her own decision. She follows what her father and brother tells. 

Thank you. 

Pamela or Virtue Rewarded

  This blog is based upon Thinking activity.

  For more information you can Visit here

▶If Pamela was in the contemporary time, will the story take any change?

         In the 18th century when the story of Pamela happened, girls like her followed strict rules and had to be very obedient and modest. They put a lot of importance on being good and following what society said, especially when it came to relationships.

       But now, women have more freedom and can be more independent. They don't have to follow old rules as strictly, and they can focus on their education and work. In relationships, they expect quality and knowing well women rights, making sure they are not betrayed, treated well and respected.

     ● If Pamela was in the contemporary time, it will take many differences.

          In the novel the character named Pamela she faces harrasment if it was in the contemporary time she would likely have more resources and support available to her compared to the 18th century. she would hopefully have access to immediate help and resources, such as contacting the authorities, and reaching out to support organizations that deal with victims. She did not tolerate anything ,She wouldn't stay quiet and would stand up against harassment, speaking out against the person who is responsible. She leave that environment and find another job or opportunity. and the story will change and also it ended differently. 

       In the 18th century novel, Pamela and Mr.B married, and it is revealed after their marriage that Mr.B has a son from previous relationship. and Pamela has no objection against him and she accepted the reality. If it was in the contemporary time Pamela might not be so accepting. She could take a stand against Mr. B's Son. Pamela never forgive Mr.B and never accept it. they will be separated. 

        In the novel Pamela is harass by Mr.B and when she is finally going back to her parents house she receives a letter from Mr.B, in that letter Mr.B apologize and express his feelings for Pamela and Pamela accept it and returns. And they also marries. if it was in the contemporary time Pamela never forgive Mr.B and she will not marry with Him and she will go home. 

        In the novel while Pamela wants to go home and meet her parents she is dependent on Mr. B,  like Mr.B arrange all things and then she will go. She is not arranging all things by herself. If it was in the contemporary time She will arrange it all by herself. Pamela would independently return to her parents house. Like she can take transport by herself or she can drive by herself.

     

      In the 18th century, she had to write in her journal and send letters, patiently waiting a long time for a response. However, in modern times, things have changed. Pamela would use technology like emails or texts for quicker communication, eliminating the long waits for a reply. She can contact her parents and Mr. William easily and tell her parents immediately about Mr. B's behaviour towards her. 

Thank you 

Frankenstein Movie Review

 Hello,

 This blog is based upon Thinking Activity.   Movie review on Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Pride and Prejudice, a romantic drama. 

▶Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a 1994 Science fiction horror film directed by Kenneth branagh. 

            "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" (1994), directed by Kenneth Branagh, is a cinematic attempt to faithfully adapt the iconic Gothic novel into a science fiction film.

Here,  you can watch trailer of the movie,

              Frankenstein" is about a scientist named Victor Frankenstein. Branagh gives a powerful performance as Victor Frankenstein, the brilliant but misguided scientist who creates a monster from body parts. Victor Frankenstein, becomes obsessed with creating life. He makes a big mistake by creating a monster using science. The monster looks scary and struggles to fit in with people. It becomes lonely and wants a companion. Victor feels guilty for what he did. The monster becomes angry and causes trouble. The story is about how their actions affect each other and those around them.

            The actor playing Victor Frankenstein brought depth to the role, showcasing the scientist's obsession and internal struggle. Overall, the movie's performances were a significant factor in its success, adding emotional depth to the classic story. The character of Victor and a monster is a main in the movie, driving its plot and themes. 

            

            The scientist, Victor, acted very well. The monster's acting made us feel for him. The story is interesting and makes you think about science and consequences. The movie looks good, too, with cool visuals. But it can be a bit scary for some people. 

            

             In summary, "Frankenstein" is a movie that effectively balances strong performances, a thought-provoking plot, and striking visuals. The monster is very lonely and sad because people are scared of him. The story makes us think about whether we should mess with things like creating life and what happens when we do. It also shows how being kind and understanding is important.

      

▶Pride and Prejudice, a 2005 Romantic drama film directed by Joe Wright.

Here,  you can watch trailer of the movie

       "Pride and Prejudice" is a timeless classic, both in literature and film. The 2005 movie adaptation, directed by Joe Wright and starring Keira Knightley as Elizabeth Bennet and Matthew Macfadyen as Mr. Darcy, beautifully captures the essence of Jane Austen's novel. The film successfully brings Austen's beloved characters and their romantic journey to life. 

      ●Elizabeth Bennet (played by Keira Knightley)

      ●Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy (played by Matthew Macfadyen)

       ●Jane Bennet (played by Rosamund Pike)

      ● Mr. Bingley (played by Simon Woods)

      ●Mr. Bennet (played by Donald Sutherland)

      ●Mrs. Bennet (played by Brenda Blethyn):

      ●Lydia Bennet (played by Jena Malone)

        The movie takes us back to old times when manners, marriage, and social standing were crucial. The story revolves around Elizabeth Bennet, a smart and outspoken young woman, and Mr. Darcy, a wealthy and reserved gentleman.Elizabeth and Darcy initially clash due to misunderstandings and their different social backgrounds. 

      Elizabeth shows us how important it is to be true to ourselves and stand up for what we believe in. Mr. Darcy learns to be more humble and kind.The Character of Mr. Darcy represent The Pride and the character of Elizabeth represent Prejudice. 

        The movie beautifully captures their journey of personal growth and changing perceptions. Elizabeth challenges the norms of her society and stands firm in her beliefs, while Darcy learns humility and the value of genuine love.

         The movie also explores the societal pressures of that time, especially regarding marriage and family reputation. It shows the importance of love based on understanding and respect rather than superficial factors.

         The movie s conclusion emphasizes the theme of personal growth and the transformative power of love.

Thank you.  

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

 Hello,

This blog is part of Thinking Activity.

Question 1. What are some major difference between the movie and the novel Frankenstein.

Here are some key differences in the story between Mary Shelley's original Novel ''Frankenstein'' and 1994 Movie Adaptation

▶Creation of female monster

The major difference between the Novel and movie is a creation of female monster. In the 1994 film adaptation, Victor Frankenstein does indeed create a female companion, he alive Elizabeth who is dead and killed by Monster, Victor and Monster they both wants female creature and female creature dies, whereas in the novel, Victor ultimately destroys the female creature.

▶ Justine's Punishment

The other major difference between the Novel and movie is Justine's Punishment. Justine Moritz is a servant in the Frankenstein household, falsely accused and convicted of William Frankenstein's murder.

Justine is ultimately executed for the crime she did not commit. In the movie adaptation of "Frankenstein," Justine is depicted being hanged by the community, leading to her death. However, in the original novel by Mary Shelley, Justine is not punished and survives.

▶ Blind man's Grandchildren

In the movie "Frankenstein," there are grandchildren of a blind man- De Lacey, but in the Novel, there are no such characters.

Question 2. Who do you think is real Monster?

Frankenstein, the real monster is not the creature—it's how people in society treat him. The creature transforms into a monster due to the rejection and mistreatment it faces from society. The creature's transformation into a monster is because of Society's treatment against Monster.

Initially, the creature is born as an innocent being, but people treat him horribly. They fear and hate him just because of how he looks.They judge him without giving him a chance. People scream, run away, and even attack him. He tries to be kind and find friendship, but everyone rejects him. This constant rejection makes him angry and sad, and he eventually decides to seek revenge on those who treated him badly. So, society's cruelty turns him into the monster he's seen as.

Question 3. Do you think the search of knowledge is dangerous and destructive?

          Yes, The Search of knowledge is dangerous and destructive when we really gey into it. And take it too much. Things can get really Risky. 

The Novel "Frankenstein," there's a man named Victor who loves learning and discovering new things.Victor Frankenstein, becomes obsessed with creating life. He delves into studying and experimenting with knowledge beyond the limits of what's known at the time. This obsession turns destructive. He wants to understand how life works and how to make it. He studies and learns a lot, but he goes too far. He starts trying to make a person all by himself. He create a creature.

In the novel The Monster He kills Victor's younger brother, his best friend, and frames an innocent for these murders. He wants to hurt Victor the way Victor hurt him by taking away those he loves. The creation of creature is become dangerous and destructive. and ended up causing the loss of many lives.

Question 4. Do you think Victor Frankenstein's creature was inherently evil, or Society's rejection and mistreatment turn him into a monster?

The creature in "Frankenstein" is not inherently evil. He starts as a blank slate, and he learn and wants to become a part of society. However, it's the rejection, isolation, and mistreatment by society that ultimately turn him into Monster. The creature wasn't born bad. People treating him badly made him act like a monster. People were scared of him because he looked different. They didn't try to understand him they attacked him, called him horrible, and treated him like he was evil. This made the creature very sad and angry.

Because of all this mistreatment, the creature began to act out. He wanted revenge because he felt so hurt by how he was treated. the society's fear and hate turned the creature into what they thought he was - a monster.

Question 5. Should there be limits on scientific exploration ? If so, what should those limits be?

Yes, there should be limits on scientific exploration, and the story of Frankenstein clearly shows us why.

Victor Frankenstein wanted to learn a lot, but he didn't think about what might go wrong.there should be rules to make sure scientists think before they do something, especially if it's big and might affect people. These rules should help them understand the good and bad.

●The first limit is about safety.

Safety in scientific exploration means being cautious so that what you're doing doesn't hurt anyone or cause problems. In the novel ''Frankenstein'' victor doesn't think that his creature is not safe for the society, he harm people or the world around us, and it creates many problems and led to many death. 

●Another limit is considering the consequences.

In the novel "Frankenstein," considering the consequences in scientific exploration means thinking about what might happen because of your actions. Victor Frankenstein didn't think about the possible outcomes of creating a living being, and this lack of foresight led to tragedy.

When Victor abandoned the creature, he didn't consider how it would feel to be left alone and rejected. This neglect made the creature angry and harm others.

●Ethical limits are vital.

Scientists should avoid experiments that go against moral values, like creating life without taking responsibility for it, as seen in the novel.

Thank you for Visiting.